Condemnees appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict awarding them $40,000 and recommending attorney fees. We affirm.
1. Being dissatisfied with the amount of the award, appellants-condemnees challenge the jury verdict on the ground that they did not receive just and adequate compensation. We must take issue with appellants’ position.
"[I]n insisting that the verdict in the amount
*74
rendered is wholly inadequate [appellants address themselves] to the discretion of the trial judge rather than to the appellate powers of this court, since the rule we must follow is that a value finding in a condemnation case will not be set aside as inadequate or excessive where it is within the range of the evidence. [Cit.]”
Freedman v. Housing Authority of the City of Atlanta,
2. In its brief, appellee-condemnor, citing
DeKalb County v. Trustees, &c. Elks,
As appellee did not file a cross appeal or an independent appeal to the judgment, this court is without the jurisdictional power to consider the issue.
Irby v. Christian,
Judgment affirmed.
