History
  • No items yet
midpage
Glover-White Mercantile Co. v. Ausburn
104 S.E. 927
Ga. Ct. App.
1920
Check Treatment
Jenkins, P. J.

One suing for breacli of the specific terms of an express contract cannot by amendment convert the suit into an action for tort, based on fraud and deceit, nor can he join such an action on contract with one based on tort. Brooke v. Cole, 108 Ga. 251, 252 (33 S. E. 849); Wolff v. Southern Ry. Co., 130 Ga. 251 (60 S. E. 569). Judgment reversed.

Stephens and Smith, JJ., concur. Wright Willingham, L. H. Covington, for plaintiff in error. M. B. Edwards, contra.

Case Details

Case Name: Glover-White Mercantile Co. v. Ausburn
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Nov 10, 1920
Citation: 104 S.E. 927
Docket Number: 11261
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.