92 Iowa 286 | Iowa | 1894
III. The verdict is claimed to have been excessive, and contrary to the law and evidence. We think the evidence fully sustains plaintiff’s claim that this property is exempt. At any rate, it is of such a character that we are not justified in disturbing the verdict.
IY. Errors are assigned upon the action of the court in giving and refusing instructions and in admitting testimony. They are not well taken. We have fully examined the record, and discover no error. Affirmed.