130 Ga. 476 | Ga. | 1908
The action was complaint for land. After the 'introduction of evidence by the plaintiff and the defendant, the ■court directed a verdict in favor of the latter, and the plaintiff i excepted. The plaintiff introduced sufficient evidence of title to
Dnder the view we take of the case, it is unnecessary to determine whether the deed was properly executed and recorded. There-was in fact a sale by the sheriff, after default and judgment for recovery of the debt secured by the security deed, and the plaintiff in fi. fa. became the purchaser of the property, and afterwards sold it to the defendant in the present case, who holds a bond for
Judgment affirmed.