History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gloucester Cnty. Sch. Bd. v. G.G.
579 U.S. 961
SCOTUS
2016
Check Treatment
Justice BREYER, concurring.

In light of the facts that four Justices have voted to grant the application referred to the Court by THE CHIEF JUSTICE, that we are currently in recess, and that granting a stay will preserve the status quo (as of the time the Court of Appeals made its decision) until the Court considers the forthcoming petition for certiorari, I vote to grant the application as a courtesy. See MedellĂ­n v. Texas , 554 U.S. 759, 765, 129 S.Ct. 360, 171 L.Ed.2d 833 (2008) (BREYER, J., dissenting).

Justice GINSBURG, Justice SOTOMAYOR, and Justice KAGAN would deny the application.

Case Details

Case Name: Gloucester Cnty. Sch. Bd. v. G.G.
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Aug 3, 2016
Citation: 579 U.S. 961
Docket Number: No. 16A52.
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In