midpage

Gloth v. Brusco Equities, LLC, Inc.Gloth v. Brusco Equities, LLC, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Nov 25, 2003
Versions:1 A.D.3d 294
1 A.D.2d 294
767 N.Y.S.2d 593
2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12538

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Beeler, J), entered January 2, 2003, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

There is no evidence that defendants had actual or constructive notice of the defective condition that caused plaintiff’s injury (see Juarez v Wavecrest Mgt. Team, 88 NY2d 628, 646 [1996]). The court properly disregarded plaintiffs affidavit on the issue of notice since it contradicted his prior deposition testimony and was clearly tailored to create an issue of fact (Phillips v Bronx Lebanon Hosp., 268 AD2d 318, 320 [2000]). Concur — Nardelli, J.P, Andrias, Rosenberger and Friedman, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Gloth v. Brusco Equities, LLC, Inc.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Nov 25, 2003
Citations: 1 A.D.3d 294; 1 A.D.2d 294; 767 N.Y.S.2d 593; 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12538
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In