Lead Opinion
We have for review Glen Edward Rogers’ appeal of the circuit court’s order denying Rogers’ motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. This Court has- jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.
Rogers’ motion sought relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Hurst v. Florida, — U.S.-,
. After reviewing Rogers’ response to the order to show.cause,'as well as the State’s arguments in reply, we conclude that Rogers is not entitled to-relief. Rogers was sentenced to death following a jury’s unanimous
The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Rogers, we caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so ordered.
Concurrence Opinion
concurring in result.
I concur in result because I recognize that this Court’s opinion in Hitchcock v. State,
