History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gleaton v. Aultman
150 Ga. 768
Ga.
1920
Check Treatment
Gilbert, J.

Under the pleadings and the evidence the judge oí the superior court did not abuse his discretion in granting an interlocutory injunction. Judgment affirmed.

Sll the Justices concur. Passmore cG Forehand, for plaintiff in error,

cited: Civil Code, § 3666; Guin v. Hilton &c. Co., 6 Ga. App. 487, and cit.; Smith v. Smith, 105 Ga. 111; Woodward v. Gates, 38 Ga. 206; 40 Cyc. 508.

Perry & Williamson, contra,

cited: Civil Code, §§ 3666, 3497, 5493; Gray L. Co. v. Gaskin, 122 Ga. 342; Kollock v. Webb, 113 Ga. 762; Camp v. Dixon, 112 Ga. 872; Brown v. Martin, 137 Ga. 338, and cit.; Trammell v. Johnson, 54 Ga. 340, 344; Griswold v. Greer, 18 Ga. 545; 40 Cyc. 512.

Case Details

Case Name: Gleaton v. Aultman
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Dec 18, 1920
Citation: 150 Ga. 768
Docket Number: No. 2002
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.