History
  • No items yet
midpage
Glaze v. State
547 So. 2d 313
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1989
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order of revocation of probation except as to Counts II-IV. Since the findings of violations contained in Counts II-IV lack an evidentiary basis, the cause is remanded with instructions to modify the order by striking those counts. See Higgs v. State, 470 So.2d 75 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). Additionally, appellant’s sentence is reversed and remanded to the trial court with instructions to resentenee appellant in accordance with his presumptive guidelines range, or in accordance with the one-cell “bump-up” authorized by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(14). See Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d 838 (Fla.1989).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

LETTS, WALDEN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Glaze v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Aug 9, 1989
Citation: 547 So. 2d 313
Docket Number: No. 88-3083
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.