midpage

Glass v. . MooreGlass v. . Moore

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Apr 11, 1928
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Per Curiam.
Per Curiam.

The only question presented by ‍​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​‌​​​​​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‍this appeal: Is the testimony of a single witness sufficient ‍​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​‌​​​​​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‍to attack an officer’s return of process purporting regular service? We ‍​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​‌​​​​​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‍cannot so bold. All the authorities are to the contrary ‍​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​‌​​​​​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‍in this jurisdiction. See Trust Co. v. Nowell, ante, 449.

For the reasons ‍​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​‌​​​​​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‍given there must be a

New trial.

Case Details

Case Name: Glass v. . Moore
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Apr 11, 1928
Citations: 195 N.C. 871; 142 S.E. 585; 1928 N.C. LEXIS 244
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
Log In