2 N.C. 233 | Sup. Ct. N.C. | 1795
Where a case is so circumstanced that a court of law can give as complete redress as a court of equity can, a court of equity *183
should not interfere with it. Now the circumstances stated here are such as are properly cognizable in a court of law, and with respect to which a court of law can give as complete redress to the party injured as a court of equity could. The court decided in this case according toTims v. Potter,
So the bill was dismissed for want of equity.
NOTE. — Tims v. Potter,
Glover gave a negro woman to his daughter, but reserved the use of the negro during his life. There was afterwards a judgment against Glover, and an execution, and the wench sold to satisfy it, Potter becoming the purchaser, Tims, the husband of the daughter, after the death of Glover sued for the wench and her children. The plaintiff had a verdict, and a special case was made as to the children born in the lifetime of Glover.
This special case was several times argued, the defendant's counsel citing and relying upon the cases that decide the interest of money accruing during the particular estate to belong to the owner for that time or cestui que use; and also 2 Bl. Com., 396; Puff. lib., 2, c. 4, p. 11.
After time taken to consider from one term to another, the Court decided and gave their opinion at length.