616 So. 2d 499 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 1993
Samuel E. Glaseo appeals the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. With the exception of Glasco’s claim that evidence against him should have been suppressed,
REVERSED and REMANDED with directions.
. This claim is procedurally barred because it could have been raised on direct appeal. See Kennedy v. State, 547 So.2d 912 (Fla.1989).
. We note that throughout the four page order denying Glasco's 3.850 motion, the trial judge cited to documents refuting Glasco’s claims which the order states are attached. However, a review of the record and an inquiry to the Clerk’s Office of the Eighteenth Judicial Circuit confirms that no documents were attached to the order. This is a common and recurring problem. We ask the trial courts to implement procedures to assure that referenced documents or transcripts are in fact attached to all orders denying a defendant’s 3.850 motion.