Glacy v. 1109 Manhattan Avenue Housing Development Fund Corp.Glacy v. 1109 Manhattan Avenue Housing Development Fund Corp.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schneier, J.), dated September 12, 2003, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.
The plaintiff, a resident of a men’s shelter operated by the defendant, allegedly slipped and fell on a wet tile floor as he was returning to his room after taking a shower. The plaintiff had not noticed any wetness in the area on his way to the shower approximately 10 minutes earlier, nor did he observe anyone mopping or cleaning the floor prior to the accident.
By submitting evidence that it neither created the condition which allegedly caused the plaintiff to slip, nor had actual or constructive notice of that condition, the defendant established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, shifting the burden to the plaintiff to produce evidentiary proof in admissible form establishing the existence of a triable issue of fact {see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,