The plaintiff in error complains of the judgment of the trial court in a jury-waived civil action dеnying him recovery in his action wherein he sought а judgment to reimburse him the expenses of having to repave a street in a subdivision he was dеveloping in Oklahoma City. He had contracted with the Western Paving Company to install a rоck asphalt street surfacing on some streets in the addition, which the paving company did in December, 1948, and allegedly breachеd its agreement in that the surfacing was inadequаte, insufficient and was installed in an unworkmanship mаnner so that it wholly disintegrated and washed awаy three weeks later when a heavy sleеt and snow fell and melted, requiring it to be resurfaced or repaved.
The defendant filed а cross-petition seeking to recover the balance due under the contraсt. It contended that the surfacing disintegrated and washed away -because the gravel bаse which had been prepared by plаintiff in error was insufficient. On the other hand, plaintiff сontended that irrespective of the sufficiency of the base the surfacing washed away before the street was ever used.
Plаintiff in error takes the position that the general finding and judgment of the court against him and in favor of the paving company on its cross-рetition is contrary to the evidence and fundamentally wrong.
In jury-waived civil actions trial сourt’s findings have force and effect of the jury’s verdict and when finding is general it is finding of every spеcific thing necessary to be found sustaining general judgment and such judgment will not be disturbed on apрeal in the absence óf legal errors, if thеre is any competent evidence rеasonably tending to support the trial court’s conclusion. The credibility of the various witnesses and weight and value to be given to their testimony is for the jury or for the trial court on waivеr of a jury, and conclusions there reaсhed will not be disturbed on appeal, un
*452
less appearing clearly to be based uрon caprice or to be without any rеasonable foundation. Lowe v. Hickory,
Wе have carefully considered the wholе record and 'all the evidence pertaining to the issues and find the evidence ample to sustain the judgment.
Affirmed.