History
  • No items yet
midpage
Girard v. Miller
55 Idaho 430
Idaho
1935
Check Treatment

Plaintiff seeks herein a writ of mandate to compel the defendant, who has heretofore refused, to provide a ballot title for a referendum petition, under chapter 210, Idaho Session Laws, 1933. An alternative writ issued and the case has been argued and submitted.

The defendant justifies his refusal on various statutory and constitutional grounds, and questions have been argued and presented to the court, none of which are deemed to be at the present time properly before the court, or essential to a decision of this matter.

The sole point now determined, and deemed necessary to be determined, is that the duty devolving upon the defendant is ministerial. (Beem v. Davis et al., 31 Idaho 730, 175 P. 959;Logan v. Carter et al., 49 Idaho 393, at 402, 288 P. 424;Porter and Adams v. Adair, 48 Idaho 248, 282 P. 379.)

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, that a peremptory writ of mandate issue forthwith, requiring defendant to immediately provide and return to plaintiff a title for the referendum ballot, in accordance with section 9, chapter 210, supra.

Rice, District Judge, sat in place of Justice Ailshie. *Page 432

Case Details

Case Name: Girard v. Miller
Court Name: Idaho Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 2, 1935
Citation: 55 Idaho 430
Docket Number: No. 6253.
Court Abbreviation: Idaho
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.