History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gilson Quartz Mining Co. v. Gilson
47 Cal. 597
Cal.
1874
Check Treatment
By the Court:

1. The plaintiff having been nonsuited at the trial on July 11th, the “findings of fact and conclusions of law,” filed on the twenty-sixth of July, are without precedent in point of practice.

2. The Court manifestly erred in nonsuiting the plaintiff, who was not bound to return to the defendants the moneys received of them in part satisfaction of the judgment, for the plaintiff is entitled to retain these moneys in any aspect of the case.

*602Nor does it concern the defendants what disposition has been made of the Kenfield stock. If it had been returned to Kenfield, it would not have benefited the defendants in anywise.-

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial. Bemittitur forthwith.

Case Details

Case Name: Gilson Quartz Mining Co. v. Gilson
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 1, 1874
Citation: 47 Cal. 597
Docket Number: No. 3,970
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.