133 Minn. 238 | Minn. | 1916
Action on an accident insurance policy. Verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals from the order denying its alternative motion for judgment or for a new trial.
1. Under the policy the defendant was not liable for an accident resulting from “unnecessary exposure to obvious risk of injury.” The
3. The policy promised double indemnity in case the insured sustained an injury “while riding as a passenger on any railway passenger car.” The court submitted the question of double indemnity to the jury charg
Assignments other than those discussed do not require specific mention. The trial was without error.
Order affirmed.