History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gillin v. Canary
18 Misc. 736
City of New York Municipal Cou...
1896
Check Treatment
Fitzsimons, J.

These two actions were, on motion of the defendant, consolidated and made one action, and he now complains because judgment was rendered against him for the sum of four thousand two hundred and twenty-seven and fifty-hundredths dollars ($4,227.50), contending that in no event can a judgment for more than two thousand dollars ($2,000) be rendered in this court.'

This question was passed upon adversely to the appellant’s contention by this court (Bush v. Abraham, 2 N. Y. Supp. 391) in a case similar to this one.

We have examined the record carefully and find no reason to question the judgment herein; it is, therefore, affirmed, with costs.

Schuchman, J., concurs.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Gillin v. Canary
Court Name: City of New York Municipal Court
Date Published: Oct 15, 1896
Citation: 18 Misc. 736
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.