Gilliland v. StateGilliland v. State
In 2010, this court affirmed appellant Michael Gilliland‘s convictions for rape and sexual assault. Gilliland v. State, 2010 Ark. 135, 361 S.W.3d 279. Appellant filed a pro se petition for postconviction relief pursuant to
In order to determine if this court has jurisdiction to consider the appeal, the first question we must address is whether the trial court had jurisdiction to consider appellant‘s Rule 37.1 petition. Sims v. State, 2011 Ark. 135 (per curiam) (where the circuit court lacks jurisdiction, the appellate court also lacks jurisdiction). The filing date noted on appellant‘s Rule 37.1 petition indicates that it was filed twenty-four days after the last date for filing under
The time limitations in
While appellant‘s response includes a letter from the Hot Spring County Circuit Clerk verifying this statement of fact, we cannot ascertain the actual date of tender of the petition in this case. Accordingly, we remand to the trial court for factual findings concerning the date of tender. The circuit court shall return its findings of fact, along with a transcript of any hearing on the matter, within thirty days from the date of this order. Further action on the pending appeal is delayed until the findings and hearing transcript are received.
The State also filed a motion for extension of time to file its brief in conjunction with the motion to dismiss. As the pending appeal is delayed until the findings and hearing transcript are received, this motion is moot.
Remanded for findings of fact.