midpage

Gilliam v. StateGilliam v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Feb 9, 1944
No. 22754.
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Hawkins
HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for possessing for the purpose of sale whisky in ‍‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​​​‌‍a dry area, the punishment assessed being a fine of $100.00.

There appears in the record a request that the appeal be dismissed, but same ‍‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​​​‌‍is signed only by appellant’s attorney. A request for dismissal must be executed by the appellant in person and properly authenticated. See 4 Tex. ‍‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​​​‌‍Jur., p. 497, sec. 347; Jennings v. State, 68 Tex. Cr. R. 613, 151 S. W. 1050; Catron v. State, 63 Tex. Cr. R. 377, 140 S. W. ‍‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​​​‌‍226.

The State’s pleadings are in proper form to charge the offense, and there is no statement of facts nor bills of exception in the ‍‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​​​‌‍record. In this condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Gilliam v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Feb 9, 1944
Citations: 177 S.W.2d 782; 146 Tex. Crim. 620; 1944 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 826; No. 22754.
Docket Number: No. 22754.
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
Log In