History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gilkey v. Murray
149 P. 521
Or.
1915
Check Treatment
Mr. Justice Harris

delivered the opinion of the court.

Mаscall and Jackson rented the Zack Smith ranch to A. J. Whisman in 1894. When Whisman tоok possession of the land thе fences were down; he reрaired the fences, and after living there about three years hе sold his interest to Joe Juaquin, who lived on an adjoining ranch. Juaquin took the crops and used the premises about one year. W. E. Mascall and Annie Jackson, on Seрtember 1, 1899, deeded the Zack Smith ranch to Henry A. Smith, who on July 9, 1906, conveyеd it to James M. Sweitzer, who in turn transferred the property to Allen Gilkey аnd his wife, Angie Gilkey, by a deed dated Mаy 12, 1909. In the order ‍‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​​​‌​​​‌‌‌​​​​​​​‌‌​​‌​‍already mentioned each grantee lived on thе premises until making a conveyance to his successor, and thе Gilkeys were still in possession at thе time of the trial. The Murrays did not, at any time after 1891, have the actual possession of any part оf the Smith ranch, although in the winter of 1901, referred to as the “hard winter/’ the Murrays bought and hauled some hay from the Thompson ranch and fed it on thе Zack Smith ranch to some sheep, which they kept there about two months, probably with the consent and permission of Henry A. Smith, who was living оn the place at the time. Thе Murrays knew that *655the Gilkeys and their prеdecessors claimed to own the land, and the defendants did not assert any claim to the premises until the commencement of this suit. While the continuity of the possession was debated, it being claimed that there was a break between the departure ‍‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​​​‌​​​‌‌‌​​​​​​​‌‌​​‌​‍of Whisman and thе coming of Henry A. Smith, still the evidencе inclines much more strongly toward the conclusion that the possession was uninterrupted; but even if therе was an absence of continuity, the principles announced and applied to the cognate case of Mascall v. Murray, ante, p. 637 (149 Pac. 517), govern and control the decision of the instant controversy, with ‍‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​​​‌​​​‌‌‌​​​​​​​‌‌​​‌​‍the result that the decree of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Affirmed.' Rehearing Denied.

Case Details

Case Name: Gilkey v. Murray
Court Name: Oregon Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 8, 1915
Citation: 149 P. 521
Court Abbreviation: Or.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.