History
  • No items yet
midpage
Giles v. Merritt
59 N.H. 325
| N.H. | 1879
|
Check Treatment

The money delivered by the plaintiff to the defendant to be deposited in the bank was the plaintiff's money. It was received by the defendant, and deposited by her in her own name as the money of the plaintiff, and the defendant acquired no title to it by the transaction. The appropriation of the money to her own use by the defendant was a conversion, and no demand was necessary. Whittier v. Whittier, 31 N.H. 452, 462, 464, 465. The plaintiff's claim is not barred by the statute of limitations. The cause of action did not accrue until the money was wrongfully withdrawn from the bank and appropriated by the defendant.

Judgment for the plaintiff.

BINGHAM, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Giles v. Merritt
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Dec 5, 1879
Citation: 59 N.H. 325
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.