History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gilbert v. Synagro Central, LLC
628 Pa. 4
| Pa. | 2014
|
Check Treatment

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 9th day of October, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue is:

Did the Superior Court incorrectly interpret the Pennsylvania [RTFA] by requiring a jury trial to determine that the land application of biosolids falls within the Act’s definition of a “normal agricultural operation,” which was contrary to the Act and this Court’s precedent that statutes of repose and statutory interpretation present questions of law for resolution by courts, not juries?

Case Details

Case Name: Gilbert v. Synagro Central, LLC
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Oct 9, 2014
Citation: 628 Pa. 4
Docket Number: No. 358 MAL 2014
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.