History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gilbert v. State
148 Fla. 293
Fla.
1941
Check Treatment

Appeal brings for review judgments of conviction of the offense of unlawfully living in an open state of adultery.

The sole challenge is to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the judgment.

The record discloses no motion for new trial. Therefore, review of error predicated on insufficiency of evidence is not available. See Schmids v. Tampa Pub. Co., 72 Fla. 571, 73 So. 593; St. Andrews Bay Lbr. Co. v. Bernard, 106 Fla. 232,143 So. 159; Davis *Page 294 v. State, 47 Fla. 26, 36 So. 170; Florida Power Co. v. Cason,79 Fla. 619, 84 So. 921; Osceola Fertilizer Co. v. Beville,86 Fla. 479, 98 So. 354; 356, citing Greenblatt v. Bissell Dry Goods Co., 85 Fla. 83, 95 So. 302; Johnson v. State, 53 Fla. 42,43 So. 430; Thomas Bros. Co. v. Price, 56 Fla. 854,48 So. 262.

No reversible error appearing from the record, the judgments are affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

BROWN, C. J., WHITFIELD, BUFORD and ADAMS, J. J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Gilbert v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Oct 21, 1941
Citation: 148 Fla. 293
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.