History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gilbert v. State
121 So. 922
| Ala. Ct. App. | 1929
|
Check Treatment

This entire record, including the whole evidence in the case, has been examined and read by the court, sitting en banc. We are clear to the conclusion that appellant's motion for a new trial should have been granted, on the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the jury's verdict, and, for the error in overruling it, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: Gilbert v. State
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 19, 1929
Citation: 121 So. 922
Docket Number: 7 Div. 511.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.