Judgment affirmed, with costs. Van Kirk, P. J., Whitmyer and Hasbrouek, JJ., concur; Hinman and Davis, JJ., dissent and vote for reversal and a new trial on the ground that no question of fraud was asserted or submitted to the jury, and that the plaintiff at all times had in his possession a written agreement showing exactly the amount due and payable by him on the automobile.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.
