197 S.W.2d 247 | Ky. Ct. App. | 1946
Affirming.
The judgment is upon a conviction of attempted rape of a child under 12 years of age, with a penalty Of five years imprisonment. KRS
The child was 10 years old. She lived near the defendant and his family and was frequently in their home. She testified that on this afternoon she and her 7-year-old sister had gone there and found the family away; that the defendant sent the younger child to buy some comic books and then pulled her by the arm down an alley (a distance of two squares), then beyond (about 1 1/2 squares) into some high weeds behind a flood wall in Paducah. She was resisting all the while. A recital of the sordid details as related by the child is undesirable and unnecessary. It is sufficient to say that consummation of the man's purpose was probably prevented only by the immaturity of the child. His defense was a denial and alibi. Some parts of the child's story seem fanciful, and there was testimony that she would not tell the truth. The defendant established a good reputation by witnesses who had never heard of him being in trouble. Of course, all of this presented an issue for the jury.
Upon a review of prior conflicting decisions, the court held in Meade v. Commonwealth,
Under the evidence it was not prejudicial to omit an instruction on detaining a woman against her will.
The judgment is affirmed.