Gilbert Properties, Inc. v. MillsteinGilbert Properties, Inc. v. Millstein
- Reporters:
- , , ,
Order affirmed, without costs, in the following memorandum: Plaintiff client’s cause of action against defendant attorney for malpractice accrued, at the latest, when the áttorney-cliént relationship between them ended in 1966. (Cf., e.g.,
Borgia
v.
City of New York,
12 N Y 2d 151, 155;
Siegel
v.
Kranis,
29 A D 2d 477, 480; see, also, Note, 18 ALR 3d 985
et seq.)
Consequently, since the plaintiff’s suit for malpractice was commenced in 1970, the determination of the Appellate Division that the-plaintiff’s action was time-barred by the three-year period of limitations (
Concur: Chief Judge Fetld and Judges Burke, Brbitel, Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones and Waohtler.