History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gifford v. Dyer
2 R.I. 99
R.I.
1852
Check Treatment

It is very apparent in the present case, that the testatrix would have made the same will, had she known her son was living. She did not intend to give him anything, if living.

But if this were not apparent and she had made the will under a mistake as to the supposed death of her son, this could not be shown dehors the will. The mistake must appear on the face of the will, and it must also appear what would have been the will of the testatrix but for the mistake. Thus, where the testator revokes a legacy, upon the mistaken supposition that the legatee is dead, and this appears on the face of the instrument of revocation, such revocation was held void. Campbell v.French, 3 Vesey, 321. *Page 103

Case Details

Case Name: Gifford v. Dyer
Court Name: Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Date Published: Mar 6, 1852
Citation: 2 R.I. 99
Court Abbreviation: R.I.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.