History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gifford v. Brownell
84 Mass. 534
| Mass. | 1861
|
Check Treatment
By the Court.

This case cannot properly come here by exceptions. The motion for a new trial involved questions of fact as well as of law. If the decision of the motion turned on the use of due diligence by the plaintiffs, it required the court to *535pass upon a matter which could not be determined without considering the situation, conduct and circumstances of the defendant. These were essential elements of fact which must have been passed on in order to apply the rule of law properly to the question to be decided by the court. Cochrane v. City of Boston, 1 Allen, 480.

Exceptions dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Gifford v. Brownell
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Oct 15, 1861
Citation: 84 Mass. 534
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.