History
  • No items yet
midpage
Giddings v. Sears
103 Mass. 311
Mass.
1869
Check Treatment
Colt, J.

There is nothing in the case which seems to require the instruction which the defendant requested. Upon the defendant’s evidence, it is plain that the plaintiffs purchased for him upon his order, and held , the stock only as agents for him. The rule asked for is applicable only where the plaintiff seeks tc recover damages for the breach of an executory contract of sale. The jury must have found, under the instructions given, that the stock was bought and held by the plaintiffs for the defendant, and that he did not order it to be sold.

Judgment on the verdict.

Case Details

Case Name: Giddings v. Sears
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Nov 15, 1869
Citation: 103 Mass. 311
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.