70 Iowa 486 | Iowa | 1886
It may be conceded that the entry shows an intention on the part of Judge Shame to enter a judgment for some amount in favor of the plaintiff, but the
Besides, if we could hold that the court below might have considered the affidavit of Iliens, the plaintiff’s attorney, as to what Judge Shane’s intention was, we could not say that it erred in overruling the motion. If the court could have considered Heins’ affidavit to the effect that Judge ShaNE intended to enter a judgment for the full amount of the note and acceptance, it would have been equally proper to receive and consider other affidavits to the effect that such was not his intention, and it may be that the court did so. The abstract does not purport to contain all the evidence introduced before the court below.'
We think that the motion was properly overruled.
Affirmed.