Giddens v. Giddens
129 Ga. 246 | Ga. | 1907
No complaint being made that any error of law was committed upon the trial, the only grounds of the motion for a new trial being that the verdict was contrary to law and to the evidence, and without evidence to support it; and the evidence, though conflicting, being amply sufficient to authorize the verdict, there was no abuse of discretion in. refusing a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.