History
  • No items yet
midpage
Giddens v. Giddens
58 S.E. 708
Ga.
1907
Check Treatment
Eish, C. J.

No complaint being made that any error of law was committed upon the trial, the only grounds of the motion for a new trial being that the verdict was contrary to law and to the evidence, and without evidence to support it; and the evidence, though conflicting, being amply sufficient to authorize the verdict, there was no abuse of discretion in. refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concw.

Case Details

Case Name: Giddens v. Giddens
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Aug 12, 1907
Citation: 58 S.E. 708
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.