midpage

Gibson v. StateGibson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Aug 5, 1980
No. 78-1683
Reporters:
,
Before:
Barkdull
PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals from a conviction entered on a nolo ‍​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌​​‌​​‍plea, in which the right to review the denial of his motion to suppress his confessions was specifically reserved. Under Brown ‍​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌​​‌​​‍v. State, 376 So.2d 382 (Fla. 1979), we are required to dismiss the appeal. As did the court in Brown, however, we direct that, after ‍​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌​​‌​​‍remand, the defendant *589shall be permitted to withdraw his plea and to plead anew, provided that the state does not establish ‍​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌​​‌​​‍that it has been prejudiced by the subsequent delay. See, Basten v. State, 382 So.2d 1362 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); Pittman v.State, 382 So.2d 1227 (Fla. ‍​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌​​‌​​‍2d DCA 1980); McCowen v. State, 381 So.2d 284 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

Appeal dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Gibson v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Aug 5, 1980
Citations: 386 So. 2d 588; 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17310; No. 78-1683
Docket Number: No. 78-1683
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In