History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gibson v. State
42 Ga. App. 285
Ga. Ct. App.
1930
Check Treatment
Bloodworth, J.

1. Tlie court did not err in refusing to allow a witness to testify as set out in the first special ground of the motion for a new trial.

2. The court did not err in charging the jury that “When witnesses appear and testify they are presumed to speak the truth and are to be believed unless impeached in some manner known to the law or otherwise discredited in the minds of the jury.” Gillespie v. State, 37 Ga. App. 507 (140 S. E. 791) ; Hamilton v. State, 143 Ga. 265 (5) (84 S. E. 583).

3. The evidence authorized the verdict, the trial judge approved it, and properly overruled the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Buhe, J., concur. Oscar Brown, H. T. Oliver, A. G. Liles, for plaintiff in error. Clifford Pratt, solicitor-general, J. B. G. Logan, contra.

Case Details

Case Name: Gibson v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Nov 11, 1930
Citation: 42 Ga. App. 285
Docket Number: 20820
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.