History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gibson v. State
536 S.W.2d 506
Mo. Ct. App.
1976
Check Treatment
BILLINGS, Chief Judge.

Appellant Harrison Gibson and Frank W. Maupin were convicted in Greene County of attempted second degree burglary. They appealed their convictions and their appeal is pending in this Court in Case No. 9992.1

Prior to the filing of the trial transcript in No. 9992 the appellant filed a motion to vacate the judgment and sentence under Rule 27.26, V.A.M.R. Following an eviden-tiary hearing the trial court denied appellant relief and this appeal followed. The respondent has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal, citing Rule 27.26(b)(2), which is as follows:

“A motion to vacate, set aside or correct a sentence cannot be maintained white an appeal from the conviction and sentence is pending or during the time within which an appeal may be perfected.” (emphasis added)

As noted, appellant’s direct appeal is currently pending in this Court. Appellant’s motion to vacate discloses on its face he had an appeal pending at the time the motion was filed. The trial court would have been warranted in summarily dismissing the motion by reason of the provision of Rule 27.26 as above set forth.

Respondent’s motion is sustained and the appeal'is dismissed.

All concur.

. Judgment of conviction was entered March 13, 1975. Notice of Appeal was filed March 20, 1975. Motion to vacate was filed August 27, 1975. Transcript was filed September 16, 1975, briefs have been filed, and the direct appeal is docketed for argument and submission at our June Term, 1976.

Case Details

Case Name: Gibson v. State
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 21, 1976
Citation: 536 S.W.2d 506
Docket Number: No. 10165
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.