midpage

Gibbs v. HarrelsonGibbs v. Harrelson

Supreme Court of Georgia
Nov 17, 1917
No. 318
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Gilbert
Gilbert, J.

To a suit by a creditor against grantees in a deed to ‍​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‍land executed by Ms debtor, for cancellation of the deed, and for judgment on the debt, the grantor (or, if dead, his legal representative) ‍​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‍is a necessary party; and where the petition fails to make the legal representative of the deceased debtor a party, it is properly dismissed ‍​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‍on demurrer-. Biggs v. Silvey, 140 Ga. 762 (79 S. E. 857); Kehoe v. Rourke, 131 Ga. 269 (62 S. E. 185) ; 9 C. J. 1227. This cáse differs from that of Moore v. Smith, 121 Ga. 479, 482 (49 S. ‍​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‍E. 601). In that case the suit was against the widow, who was the sole heir, and who took possession without administration, there being ‍​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‍no cancellation sought.

Judgment affirmed.

AU the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.

Case Details

Case Name: Gibbs v. Harrelson
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Nov 17, 1917
Citations: 147 Ga. 404; 94 S.E. 235; 1917 Ga. LEXIS 216; No. 318
Docket Number: No. 318
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
Log In