Gibbs v. Bartlett
63 Cal. 117
Cal.
1883
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The duties sought to be enforced on the part of the respondents are clearly enjoined by law. Performance of these duties cannot be refused on the ground set up by *118respondents, to wit, that there may not be sufficient funds in the treasury to defray the expenses of the election.

Let the writ issue as prayed.