91 N.J. Eq. 114 | N.J. | 1919
The opinion of the court was delivered by
The bill of complaint in this cause prays the reformation of a policy of insurance, in aid of an action at law thereon, by the addition of certain agreements or stipulations not contained in the written contract, which it is charged were omitted through a mistake or neglect which was mutual, or fraudulently planned to deceive and mislead the complainants. The vice-chancellor who heard the cause decided that the policy be reformed by noting thereon, as of the date of issue, that the property insured stood on leased ground; that it was subject to a chattel mort
For affirmance — None.
For reversal — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenuhardv Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, Ackerson — 12.