Gettings v. StateGettings v. State
- Reporters:
- , ,
- Before:
- Lawson
The, only insistence made by petitioner is that the Court of Appeals erred in holding that the trial court correctly refused defendant’s requested Charge No. 8. ,
In our opinion said charge was properly refused upon the ground, aside from any other deficiency, that it omits any reference to- a consideration of the other evidence in the case. Pate v. State, 150 Ala. 10, 43 So. 343.
Writ denied.
GARDNER, C. J., and FOSTER and STAKELY, JJ., concur.