Gerstley v. Best
108 N.J.L. 189
| N.J. | 1931

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DALY, DONGES, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None. *Page 190