History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gerstein v. Fisher
14 Misc. 644
The Superior Court of New York...
1895
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The order appealed from should be affirmed on the opinion filed by the learned judge below. In view of the decisions in Collins v. Hydorn, 135 N. Y. 320, and Furlong v. Banta, 80 Hun, 248, the case of Anderson v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 9 Daly, 487, cannot be followed, and the decision of Featherson v. Newburgh & C. Turnpike Co., 24 N. Y. Supp. 603, has no application.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Present: Freedmah and McAdam, JJ.

- Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Case Details

Case Name: Gerstein v. Fisher
Court Name: The Superior Court of New York City
Date Published: Oct 15, 1895
Citation: 14 Misc. 644
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.