History
  • No items yet
midpage
German v. Snedeker
24 N.E.2d 492
NY
1939
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 834 Order affirmed, with costs, and questions certified answered in the affirmative. No opinion.

Concur: CRANE, Ch. J., HUBBS, LOUGHRAN, FINCH and RIPPEY, JJ. Taking no part: O'BRIEN, J. LEHMAN, J., concurs in the following memorandum:






Concurrence Opinion

Upon the record it appears that the defendants converted the stock and it does not conclusively appear whether the defendants profited by their own wrong. The rule of damages applied by the Appellate Division is, therefore, correct upon this record. I understand that we do not pass upon the correct rule of damages under circumstances that may be shown at the trial.

Case Details

Case Name: German v. Snedeker
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 28, 1939
Citation: 24 N.E.2d 492
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.