25 N.M. 415 | N.M. | 1919
OPINION OF THE COURT.
The facts in these two cases are identical, except as to the amounts involved. Plaintiffs in error brought garnishment proceedings against defendant in error, Lawson, and obtained a judgment against him in the justice court, he appealed to the district court, and, upon his motion for a dimissal of the cases in the district court being granted, plaintiffs in error appealed to this court. No process was issued of served upon Dernier, the defendant below. He did not enter his appearance, waive service, nor was he made a party by publication or otherwise.
Finding no error in the record, the judgment in the district court, dismissing the appeal from the justice court, is affirmed; and it is so ordered.