midpage

Geotel, Inc. v. WallaceGeotel, Inc. v. Wallace

New York Court of Appeals
Oct 16, 1990
Versions:76 N.Y.2d 917

Motion for leave to appeal as against defendants Extebank and Laventhol and Horwath dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for leave to appeal as against The Stuart James Co. denied.

Case Details

Case Name: Geotel, Inc. v. Wallace
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 16, 1990
Citation: 76 N.Y.2d 917
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In