History
  • No items yet
midpage
Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Heard
58 S.E. 25
Ga.
1907
Check Treatment
Evans, J.

1. Only the general grounds of the motion for new trial were referred to or argued in the brief of the plaintiff in error. The special assignments of error which were not referred to in the brief will be treated as abandoned.

2. The evidence was sufficient to uphold the verdict.

Judgment a/firmed.

All the Justices concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Heard
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Jul 10, 1907
Citation: 58 S.E. 25
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.