History
  • No items yet
midpage
Georgetown Rail Equipment v. Holland L.P.
16-2297
| Fed. Cir. | Aug 1, 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before R EYNA , S CHALL , and W ALLACH , Circuit Judges. *2 2 GEORGETOWN RAIL EQUIP . CO . v. HOLLAND L . P .

P ER C URIAM .

Because the record in this case contains extensive material marked as confidential, the court has issued its opinion dated August 1, 2017 under seal. The court does not believe, however, that the opinion contains confiden- tial material.

The parties are hereby ordered to show cause, by means of a single joint response coordinated among the parties, why the opinion should not be unsealed. The response to this order must specify which words, if any, are proposed to be redacted, and must specifically state the cause for each such requested redaction. If the parties propose redactions, the response to this order must also propose specific words to replace each of the proposed redactions in an unsealed opinion. The joint response shall be filed no later than August 15, 2017.

F OR THE C OURT August 1, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case Details

Case Name: Georgetown Rail Equipment v. Holland L.P.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Date Published: Aug 1, 2017
Docket Number: 16-2297
Court Abbreviation: Fed. Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.