George v. Nichols
32 Me. 179 | Me. | 1850
orally.—The first objection was obviated by the defendant’s attendance at the taking.
It is not requisite that the magistrate should be a commissioner. It does not appear that he was not authorized by
orally.—The first objection was obviated by the defendant’s attendance at the taking.
It is not requisite that the magistrate should be a commissioner. It does not appear that he was not authorized by