History
  • No items yet
midpage
George v. Nichols
32 Me. 179
Me.
1850
Check Treatment
Tenney, J.,

orally.—The first objection was obviated by the defendant’s attendance at the taking.

It is not requisite that the magistrate should be a commissioner. It does not appear that he was not authorized by *180the laws of his State to take depositions. Depositions taken out of the State may be received at the discretion of the court. R. S. c. 133, § 22. Exceptions overruled.

Case Details

Case Name: George v. Nichols
Court Name: Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Date Published: Jul 1, 1850
Citation: 32 Me. 179
Court Abbreviation: Me.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.