History
  • No items yet
midpage
George Toregas v. Helen L. Susser, A. R. Seelye
290 F.2d 368
D.C. Cir.
1961
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

The District Court acted within its permissible discretion in denying plaintiff’s motions for a preliminary injunction and receiver pendente lite; but in doing so the court made findings of fact and conclusions of law which went beyond the necessities of the preliminary stage of the case and which seem to decide matters more appropriately left for decision after the trial. For this reason, exercising our authority under 28 U.S.C. § 2106 (1958), the findings and conclusions are set aside, the subject matter thereof to await full development of the facts and consideration of the law applicable thereto.

While we do not require the case to be advanced for trial we suggest that its nature might well lead the District Court to give further consideration to the motion to advance.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: George Toregas v. Helen L. Susser, A. R. Seelye
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Date Published: Apr 13, 1961
Citation: 290 F.2d 368
Docket Number: 16186
Court Abbreviation: D.C. Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In