History
  • No items yet
midpage
George T. Daley v. Sears, Roebuck & Company
182 F.2d 347
6th Cir.
1950
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

This cause was heard upon the record, briefs and argument of counsel;

And the Court being of the opinion that the ruling is controlled by Steinbeck v. John Hauck Brewing Co., 7 Ohio App. 18 and Turoff v. Richmond, 76 Ohio App. 83, 61 N.E.2d 486. See also: Den Braven v. Public Service Electric & Gas Co., 115 N.J.L. 543, 181 A. 46; Abar v. Ramsey Motor Service, 195 Minn. 597, 263 N.W. 917; Bennett v. McGoldrick-Sanderson Co., 15 Wash.2d 130, 142-144, 129 P.2d 795.

On the authority of said cases and for the reasons stated by the District Judge in his Memorandum Opinion, it is ordered that the Judgment of the District Court he affirmed. 90 F.Supp. 561.

Case Details

Case Name: George T. Daley v. Sears, Roebuck & Company
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Date Published: Apr 20, 1950
Citation: 182 F.2d 347
Docket Number: 11067_1
Court Abbreviation: 6th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.